States Are Banning Supplement Sales to Minors. Here's the Map. | Himiyer

Following New York's 2024 law requiring age verification for weight-loss and muscle-building supplements, at least five additional states — Michigan, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Hawaii — are advancing similar legislation in 2026. Legal challenges from industry groups have so far failed to block these restrictions, with federal courts affirming states' authority to regulate supplement sales based on marketing claims. The Natural Products Association has launched a federal lobbying effort to preempt this growing patchwork before it becomes entrenched.

Supplement Sales to Minors: States Keep Restricting. Industry Fights Back.

By HiMiyer.com — March 23, 2026

Protein and fitness supplement products on a gym shelf

New York Started It

New York's Dietary Supplements Act took effect in April 2024, requiring that any retailer — including e-commerce businesses shipping into New York — verify that purchasers of supplements marketed for weight loss or muscle building are at least 18 years old. The law applies based on how a product is marketed, not its formulation, meaning a broad range of protein powders, pre-workouts, and fat-burner products fall under its scope.

States Now Moving

In 2026, at least five states are advancing legislation modeled on New York's framework: Michigan, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Hawaii. Hawaii's bill would prohibit outright sales of certain supplement categories to minors, going further than New York's age-verification model. Trade organizations testified against the Hawaii bill during committee hearings, arguing the restrictions lack scientific rationale for the specific products targeted.

What Products Are Targeted

The bills consistently target two marketing categories: weight loss and muscle building. In practice, those terms are drafted broadly enough to capture protein powders, creatine supplements, pre-workout formulas, thermogenic blends, and certain herbal products. There is no uniform definition across states, creating compliance complexity for national brands with a single label.

The Council for Responsible Nutrition and other industry organizations have challenged these laws in federal court. To date, those challenges have been unsuccessful. Federal courts have upheld states' authority to regulate product sales based on marketing and labeling practices, even when the products themselves are federally legal. The legal theory that DSHEA preempts state-level age restrictions has not prevailed.

The Federal Response

The Dietary Supplement Regulatory Uniformity Act, introduced by Rep. Nick Langworthy in February 2026, is the primary federal legislative vehicle designed to address this patchwork directly. The bill would preempt state restrictions that exceed FDA's own standards. Without it, supplement brands must track and comply with a growing roster of state-specific rules that affect everything from website age-gates to retail shelf placement.

Sources

Bake the best cakes without the cakes.

Super amazing nice

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.